Three vendors, three decks
- A studio for the site. A marketplace desk. A media agency.
- Each reports a win the others cannot use.
- Budget fights for the same rupee.
- No shared offer, no shared readout, no shared quarter.
Home Case Studies 01
01 · Full system · Case
Three vendors. Three roadmaps. One clip for the quarter.
Website relaunch, marketplace expansion, and paid acquisition under one operating model — so channels reinforce each other instead of competing for budget. One team replacing three vendors.
01 · Build
Build ships what Sell can list and Scale can land.
Operating model
Same company. Different invoices.
Tap a plan. Three vendors keep three truths. One clip makes the quarter compound.
01 · Build
The site and the stack share a plan.
Website, CRM, and automation used to live with a vendor who never saw the catalogue. In the stack, Build ships the pages and the handoffs that Sell and Scale will actually use.
One clip, three trays
- Build ships pages and handoffs Sell can list.
- Sell lists the same promise Scale will buy traffic for.
- Scale only raises spend on paths that already convert.
- One weekly readout. One quarterly clip.
Channels that do not share a plan compete for budget.
The site looked finished. The catalogue had a different promise. Paid sent strangers to a homepage neither team owned. Each vendor could show a metric. None of them could show a quarter that compounded — because the work never met.
We replaced the three retainers with one operating model: Build, Sell, and Scale on the same clip, the same offer, the same weekly readout.
One team. Three surfaces. One plan the budget can actually follow.
The clip is a quarter, not a slide.
Diagnose where the three vendors disagreed. Architect the handoffs: site to CRM, catalogue to the same SKU, paid to a page that can hold the click. Then run the quarter as one stack — not as three invoices that happen to share a client name.
The artefacts were ordinary on purpose: a relaunch that sales could use, marketplace listings that matched the site, acquisition that only scaled the path that already converted.
Compounding is what happens when the trays stop lying to each other.
When Build, Sell, and Scale read the same object, budget moves toward what already works. That is the growth stack — unglamorous, and the reason one team replaced three.
Related: Build, Sell, and Scale as surfaces of the same plan. Sales ops design for the site that has to hand off.
The quarter
Three moves. One clip.
Tap a move. Diagnose the split, architect the handoffs, then run the surfaces as one stack.
What compounded
Which trays already share an object?
Tick what is true on the live stack. The bars rise together when channels reinforce — not when each vendor reports a private win.
Next step
Want one plan instead of three vendors?
Tell us who owns the site, the catalogue, and the spend today. We’ll mark where they disagree — and what a single clip would change this quarter.
Prefer email?
info@takedigitalsolutions.comReady when you are
Book a consultation
Usually replies within one business day.
Start the conversation